<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Project Specification</title>
	<link>http://www.screwlessdesign.co.uk/blog/project-specification/</link>
	<description>project and assignment diary</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Stephen Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.screwlessdesign.co.uk/blog/project-specification/#comment-4</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 00:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.screwlessdesign.co.uk/blog/project-specification/#comment-4</guid>
					<description>I received the following feedback for my specification, thanks goes out to my supervisor for helping me along the way:

1. Does the project have an investigation / information review component?
YES

2. Does the project have a significant design / strategy component?
YES

3. Does the project have an analysis / evaluation component?
YES

4. Is the deliverable clearly identified and stated?
YES.

5. Is a critical reflection of the project identified?
YES.

6. Is the project of a suitable degree of difficulty?
YES. There is scope for any degree of difficulty, depending on the features which are included in the proposed system, and the rigour with which it is evaluated (by users other than the author!).

7. Does the specification show the appropriate level of communication?
YES.

8. Only a week is allocated to â€œProduce report on completion of projectâ€? in the task plan. This is unrealistic; I assume that parts will be written up as soon as the relevant work has been done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received the following feedback for my specification, thanks goes out to my supervisor for helping me along the way:</p>
<p>1. Does the project have an investigation / information review component?<br />
YES</p>
<p>2. Does the project have a significant design / strategy component?<br />
YES</p>
<p>3. Does the project have an analysis / evaluation component?<br />
YES</p>
<p>4. Is the deliverable clearly identified and stated?<br />
YES.</p>
<p>5. Is a critical reflection of the project identified?<br />
YES.</p>
<p>6. Is the project of a suitable degree of difficulty?<br />
YES. There is scope for any degree of difficulty, depending on the features which are included in the proposed system, and the rigour with which it is evaluated (by users other than the author!).</p>
<p>7. Does the specification show the appropriate level of communication?<br />
YES.</p>
<p>8. Only a week is allocated to â€œProduce report on completion of projectâ€? in the task plan. This is unrealistic; I assume that parts will be written up as soon as the relevant work has been done.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
